Friday 16 January 2015

Apathy is Acquiescence.



Yesterday I received an email from Berkeley Earth, the independent climate science review body.  

Berkeley Earth has constructed an estimate of the global average temperature during 2014, including land and sea.  The key findings are:

1. The global surface temperature average (land and sea) for 2014 was nominally the warmest since the global instrumental record began in 1850; however, within the margin of error, it is tied with 2005 and 2010 and so we can’t be certain it set a new record.

2. For the land, 2014 was nominally the 4’th warmest year since 1753 (when the land surface temperature record began).

3. For the sea, 2014 was the warmest year on record since 1850.

One thing we should note here is that a few years ago Berkeley were quite critical of the IPCC and thought their conclusions abused statistical analysis. So those climate change deniers who made vast fortunes out of oil, the Koch brothers thought the masters of statistical analysis at Berkeley could be used as “guns for hire” to spread further disinformation. Koch brothers funded Berkeley to re-analyse the climate scientists data. Berkeley were much criticised by climate scientists for taking the polluters money. 

But scientific honesty prevailed and Berkeley duly announced after extensive statistical analysis, that global warming was real and this increase was entirely due to human caused greenhouse gas emissions. Berkeley were critical of the IPCC and expressed concern about heat islands (cities) affecting temperature readings, but broadly agreed with their findings. The Koch brothers withdrew their support but Berkeley found other funding and continue their work having set up Berkeley Earth.  Their mission “to monitor the scientific community and provide objectivity without concern for policies of government, industry or philanthropic ventures “.

However all reviewing bodies are by their nature behind the latest research. For example it takes 5 to 6 years to write papers up and get them reviewed, edited and reviewed again before they are accepted and published in scientific journals. The IPCC for example will only accept peer reviewed papers and so are several years behind the latest data.

Quite a lot of recent research shows that catastrophic abrupt climate change is with us now!

Why is this important, well one to one and a half billion people live close to sea level.  As the oceans warm, thermal expansion is causing sea levels to rise. Add to that loss of land ice in the Arctic and Antarctic which will have an even more significant impact and you start to see a worrying picture.

The IPCC are funded by the UN to review available science and advise governments. Contrary to the lies the denialists spread the IPCC do not do the research themselves.  In advising governments the IPCC stay on safe ground, they would rather underestimate the trends than open themselves to accusations of speculative claims. 

Guy McPherson for one, warns of catastrophic impact of climate change caused by the release of methane gases from the Arctic ocean. This research on Arctic methane release is not included in the IPCC models.
Paul Beckwith’s research concludes that  we are already committed to temperature increases of 5 – 11 degrees in the next 2 decades and a catastrophic sea level rise. Basically these guy’s are talking about human extinction within our lifetime.

So do you think immigration is a problem? What do we do when one billion people are flooded out and need to look for a new home. Man the borders, what a joke!

When the last IPCC report was produced on BBC’s Question Time, there were three climate change deniers on the panel and not one scientist to tell the truth. Shame on the BBC. When Nigel Lawson repeated old lies, no one challenged him. Shame on the BBC. 

We, that’s you and I, need to make sure that climate change is the biggest issue in the next general election.  

1 comment:

  1. Nice quote on the global warming slowdown from Richard Muller, founder of Berkeley Earth.
    "When walking up stairs in a tall building, it is a mistake to interpret a landing as the end of the climb."

    ReplyDelete